Diane Ravitch discussing her book, Reign of Error, on stage in Stanford's Memorial Hall. Credit: Barbara McKenna, SCOPE

Diane Ravitch discussing her volume, "Reign of Mistake," on stage in Stanford'south Memorial Hall. Credit: Barbara McKenna, Telescopic

Diane Ravitch was at Stanford University on Monday to hash out her most recent book, "Reign of Error," which argues that American schools are doing ameliorate than public soapbox suggests.

Ravitch told a standing-room-only oversupply at Stanford'southward Memorial Auditorium that the schoolhouse reform motion focused on creating charter schools and pushing schoolhouse choice is a hoax.

"Somehow reform has turned into a process that includes … closing public schools, turning public dollars over to individual entrepreneurs and pretending exam scores are the almost important role of public schooling," Ravitch said.

Ravitch, an education historian, emerged as a prominent figure in education policy in the early '90s when she worked as an assistant secretary of education under and so-President George H.West. Bush. At the time, she thought charter schools could be a useful laboratory for trying out new ideas that could then be incorporated into public schools. That has not happened, Ravitch said, citing studies showing that charter schools perform, on average, near the aforementioned as public schools. Instead, Ravitch said the "root crusade" of poor student performance is poverty, which she said isn't a problem schools can fix.

Run into Jonathan Kozol's New York Times review  of "Reign of Error."

"I retrieve this conversation that we've been having nigh school reform is only a great distraction from the fact that nosotros are seeing the greatest income inequality that we have seen in the last 100 years," Ravitch said.

In her volume, Ravitch lays out a serial of "hoaxes" she says reformers have foisted on an unsuspecting public. Among these are standardized tests, charter schools, a reliance on technology in classrooms, teacher evaluations based on student performance, and laws that allow parents to turn a traditional public school into a charter. Ravitch argues that these "solutions" don't work and, further, take been created to fix a problem that doesn't be – namely, a substandard public instruction arrangement.

"Public education is non broken," reads the first chapter of "Reign of Error." "It is not broken or declining. The diagnosis is wrong, and the solutions of the corporate reformers are wrong."

During the first portion of the Stanford upshot, Ravitch, speaking to frequent applause from a supportive audience, summarized many of the arguments in her volume. She took at aim at the people, organizations and ideas she says are turning public teaching into a private enterprise meant to benefit corporations, non assist children. After blasting Bill Gates and his Gates Foundation, which supports linking teacher evaluations to examination scores and other measures of student performance and Los Angeles Unified Superintendent John Deasy's contempo motion to buy an iPad for every Los Angeles Unified high school educatee, Ravitch noted that she'd often been criticized for not offer solutions – and went on to offer some.

She listed universal prenatal care for expectant mothers, preschool for all public school students, health care clinics at schools, schoolhouse psychologists, and a curriculum that included art, music, physical instruction and foreign languages as additions to the public schoolhouse organization she thought would assistance boost student performance. She also said teachers should be paid more and assigned smaller classes.

Ravitch said she wanted to fight the perception that because she believes American schools are performing better then they become credit for, she's opposed to change and happy with the status quo.

"I hate the condition quo," Ravitch said. "When the instruction section puts their might behind these (testing and lease schoolhouse) policies, information technology's not reform, it's the status quo."

Linda Darling-Hammond, a professor at Stanford's Graduate School of Educational activity and chair of the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, and Eric Hanushek, an educational activity economist at the Hoover Establishment at Stanford who supports many of the reform efforts Ravitch opposes, joined Ravitch on stage after her opening speech for a panel discussion moderated by longtime California journalist Peter Schrag.

In Hanushek'southward contempo volume, "Endangering Prosperity: A Global View of the American School," co-authored with Paul Peterson and Ludger Woessmann, he argues that the country'southward economic future is in jeopardy if it doesn't ready problems in the education arrangement, such every bit poor teacher quality.

Schrag's opening question was to Hanushek: Did the economist call up teachers were to blame for poor pupil performance?

"Just considering you say teachers are essential (to boosting performance), doesn't say y'all're blaming them," Hanushek said.

Hanushek said he thought elevation-quality teachers were the all-time solution to increasing the rigor of American public education. That, he argued, means better preparation of teachers and meliorate pay for teachers whose students show the most academic growth.

For an overview of Hanushek'south arguments, read this Wall Street Journal article.

Hanushek and Ravitch debated different interpretations of how well American students are faring compared to others effectually the earth.

Hanushek, as in his book, argued that America is behind likewise many other nations academically, an argument Ravitch dismissed.

Diane Ravitch, Linda From left, Darling-Hammond, Eric Hanushek, Channa Mae Cook

From left, Diane Ravitch, Linda Darling-Hammond, Eric Hanushek, Channa Mae Cook and Peter Schrag on phase in Stanford'southward Memorial Hall on Mon, September 30. Credit: Barbara McKenna, Telescopic

"Here we are, the most powerful nation in the earth, the largest economy in the earth, the hugest military machine in the earth and we're proverb we're losing," Ravitch said. "Who are nosotros losing to? I don't call up we're going to exist taken over by Singapore, they aren't going to run the world."

One attendee at the discussion, educational activity convention organizer Peggy Immature, said she agreed with much of what Ravitch said, though she wished there'd been time to hear more from Hanushek during the panel discussion because she valued the airing of multiple opinions.

"I think these kinds of public forums are part of our civic duty," she said.

Lillian Mongeau covers early childhood pedagogy. Contact her or follow her @lrmongeau.

To get more reports like this one, click hither to sign upwardly for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in instruction.